How not to tell the truth Appoint a Commission of Enquiry

B L Saraf
In  State  Government’s latest order to appoint a Commission of Enquiry  ” to tell people of Shopian  the whole truth” of  the Gagran incident of  last month , we are reminded of  1970’s , hugely  popular,   B B C  T V   serial   Yes Minister  which latter on   graduated  to  Yes  Prime Minister,  with the progression   in fortunes  of  the chief  protagonist  to become the British  Prime Minister . The serial , in scintillating   wit and humour ,  is  a telling  comment on how a manipulative  bureaucracy     lays    vice like grip on the  State  administration and pulls the strings  to  make   puppet  of even awell-meaning    Minister. Well, that    story  is  for the   other day  . The  Minister  Rt   Honourable Honecker  has some problem in his constituency . His electors  represent to him and the   Minister    wants  to do everything  by the Government to come clean on the issue.  Just,  then ,  steps   in his  Permanent Secretary, Sir Humphrey. He cautions the minister not  to go forward with the move and, in the alternative,  advises him  to have  a commission of enquiry to tell  his  electors the truth at an’ appropriate  time’.   The  permanent secretary  wins the case on the strength of his’ forceful argument’ that  the move willprovide job to a former judge or an ex   bureaucrat  – who may have obliged the Minister in the past , and secondly, the  ‘ truth ‘ will be revealed  to  the citizen    slowly and gradually,   very   convenient     for  them  to  forget.  Because, permanent secretary   argues,  informing them of the truth   in  one go and   so soon  after the event  may not be in the   “greater  public good  .”
The State Government may not have  ,   exactly   ,  the reasons which   Sir Humphry    proposed to his ‘Boss ” for  instituting the commission of enquiry,  and  could be serious in meaning the business . Nevertheless ,  how the working of some of the commissions of enquiry  instituted  in the last few years  was hampered  and how scant respect was shown to their reports  by the  Government    raises  few  serious questions  .   Coming to the latest Shopian   Enquiry  Commission,   Justice  Jan Commission’s report   — instituted   in the wake of  brutal rape and   gruesome murder of the two young ladies of the town  in 2009  –comes to the mind. Leave alone  any    action taken on the findings  of the report , the activists who fought for the  justice of   two unfortunate ladies, ironically , found themselves in the array  of accused in a criminal   case ,  filed by the CBI   to whom the investigation  of this occurrence was handed over by the  State  Government  .
The  other case in the point is the Justice  O.P Sharma   Commission report ,   which  was instituted to figure out how KuldeepVerma had died and how unceremoniously his   dead  body was cremated in utter disregard to the religious and customary  practices. The unfortunate death  was one of the sad  consequences  of   the   Amarnath    land row   which   had engulfed  the    State in year  2008 . Just to shield some erring police and  other officers  and not allowing the truth  to   come out,  the Government was   helpful  in scuttling the working  of   the Commission at every stage. It was with great personal     efforts that the Commission   submitted the report      which has yet to see the light of the day   .
To be fair to the State   Government , all   other   Governments   in the  country – including the Central one –  treat these commissions with same degree of   indifference , no matter   they  are  instituted with  great    fanfare   and  misleading  earnestness .  To  cite  few   instances  ,  Justice  Srikrishna report on Mumbai  riots of 1993   and   Justice Liberhan  Commission report on  1984   riots  gather dust.  Justice Nanavatireport onGujarat riots of 2002 is    still  awaited .
The  Government   will   have to realise that     the   problem   , indeed ,   lies in  its ‘ assumed  ‘    endeavour  to  find the  whole   truth. Because, there   are no whole  truths . As  someone has rightly said that  there  are only half truths. Allow  half-truths from contending sides to come up. Put in place a  confidence   inspiring, hassle free and efficient   mechanism  to  sift  and balance them  objectively ,  with a view to achieve larger public  good . Then, probably ,   the State  would no find  itself  obliged to go through the motions of having a ‘ fact finding  commission  ‘ whose report is  , ultimately  , consigned to   a  dust bin.  What   compounds the problem  is that the governments often  suffer  from, what Rolf  Dobelli       says  in  his  book   The Art of Thinking    Clearly,  Information Bias. It  tends to gather more information  in delusion  that it would guarantee better decision . Pray ,   concentrate on bare facts  and allow a poor citizen to know them when  it matters most.  It  is time to put an end to the farce.
By   the way ,   who   wants to know the truth ?  Stupid   !  We are living in wartimes. So,  follow what Winston Churchill said   long ago ” It  is war  time. Truth is    precious. It should be  always   attended   by a  body  guard  of  lies.”
(The author is former Principal                       District & Sessions Judge )