HC denies bail to former councilor in fraud case

Excelsior Correspondent

JAMMU, Feb 20: High Court has rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Ashiq Hussain Ganai, Former Municipal Councilor, who was allegedly involved in fraud case.
Justice Rajnesh Oswal, on perusal of the record, observed, “the complainant had filed an application before Senior Superintendent of Police, Baramulla, against the applicant and others, alleging therein that his brother was lodged in Jail at Jagadari Haryana under Section 302 IPC in connection with killing of an Army Jawan. Three persons, the applicant Manzoor Ahmad Bhat and Ashiq Hussain Lone, claiming to have high political and bureaucratic influence, assured the complainant that they could secure release of his brother and demanded an amount of Rs 5.50 lakh”.
“Believing the assurance of the accused, the complainant made a payment of Rs 3 lakh to the applicant and Rs one lakh to Umar Ganai and the remaining amount of Rs 1.50 lakh was handed over to the accused in cash but despite receiving the payment, the accused persons failed to get his brother released from the custody and demanded an additional amount of Rs one lakh which the complainant flatly refused”, the court further observed.
“The allegations against the applicant are very serious in nature and in light of the amount transferred in his account, as is evident from the bank statement, it is, prima facie, established that the applicant has received an amount of Rs 3 lakh from the complainant. The contention of counsel for the applicant that the applicant has not received any amount from the complainant gets belied in view of the record of the bank procured by the Investigating Officer”, High Court said, adding “the applicant has himself admitted that he is an accused in FIRs Nos.63/2021, 155/2016, 65/2022 and 283/2016. FIR bearing No.319/2016 was registered under Section 420, 427 and 473 RPC and FIR No.65/2022 was also registered for commission of offence under Section 420 IPC. There are very serious allegations against the petitioner in respect of receipt of money for procuring release of brother of the complainant”.
“No doubt offence under Section 420 IPC is punishable with maximum imprisonment of seven years but the antecedents of the applicant are also not clear enough for grant of bail in anticipation of arrest. Needless to say that the antecedents of the accused and the conduct of the accused are also the relevant considerations for grant of bail in anticipation of arrest”, High Court said.
With these observations, the High Court dismissed the bail application.