NEW DELHI, Dec 17:
The Supreme Court on Thursday acknowledged the right of farmers to non-violent protests and suggested the Centre to put on hold the implementation of three contentious agri laws as it was thinking of setting up an “impartial and independent” panel of agriculture experts and farmer unions to resolve the impasse.
The apex court was also of the view that the farmers’ right to protest should not infringe the fundamental rights of others to move freely and in getting essential food and other supplies as right to protest cannot mean blockade of the entire city.
A bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde said it would pass order on constituting a committee only after hearing all the parties including the protesting farmer unions and putting on hold the implementation of new farm laws by the Centre would enable negotiations with farmers.
However, Attorney General K K Venugopal opposed the suggestion and said if the implementation of the farm laws are put on hold then farmers would not come forward for negotiations.
The top court said it was not asking the Centre to stay the farm laws but only suggesting that its implementation be put on hold for the time being to enable the farmers to talk with the government.
“We are worried with the plight of farmers. We are also Indian but we are worried with the way things are going on,” the bench, also comprising Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, said and added “they (protesting farmers) are not a mob”.
The top court said it will pass order for serving of notices to the protesting farmer unions and give them the liberty to approach the vacation bench during the winter break.
During the hearing conducted through video-conferencing, the bench observed that it recognises the farmers’ right to protest but this right should not infringe the fundamental rights of others to move freely and in getting essential food and other supplies.
It said that in a democracy, police and authorities have to be given power to prevent the protestors from infringing the rights of other.
“Who will take guarantee that if farmers are allowed to enter the city in such a high numbers, they will not resort to violence? Court cannot guarantee this. Court does not have the wherewithal to prevent any such violence. It has to be the police and other authorities who will protect the right of others,” the bench said, adding that right to protest cannot mean blockade of the entire city.
It said that even police and authorities should not incite the protesting farmers to indulge in any kind of violence.
The court referred to the 1988 Boat Club protest by farmers in Delhi and said the farmers organisations had then brought the entire city to a stand-still.
The top court told Bharatiya Kisan Union (Bhanu) group, which was the only farmer organisation represented before the court, that they cannot keep on protesting without talking to the government.
“You cannot sit in protest for years and years and don’t talk to the government. We have already said that we recognise your right to protest but the protest has to have some motive. You need to talk to the government,” the bench said.
During the hearing, the bench said it would set up the committee which may include experts like P Sainath and representatives of the government and farmers’ bodies to look for the resolution of the deadlock over the statutes. (PTI)
Follow our WhatsApp channel
