The escalating diplomatic row between India and Canada represents a deepening fracture between two democratic nations. What began as allegations over the killing of a Sikh extremist leader has now spiralled into an international dispute, marked by mutual recriminations, the expulsion of diplomats, and a worsening of relations that may leave lasting scars. As of October 14, India expelled six Canadian diplomats and recalled its High Commissioner, intensifying a standoff that has cast a long shadow over the future of Indo-Canadian relations. A complex web of political, cultural, and security concerns has been built around it. Canadian Prime Minister’s allegations in September 2023 of the “potential” involvement of Indian agents in the assassination of Nijjar, a Pro Khalistan Sikh separatist leader and Canadian citizen, shocked many. However, despite repeated requests, the Canadian government has not shared concrete evidence with India, further straining the already tense diplomatic atmosphere.
For India, the allegations are nothing short of “absurd” and “baseless.” New Delhi’s decision to expel six Canadian diplomats and, in response, Canada’s decision to list Indian diplomats as “persons of interest” in the Nijjar investigation has been met with outrage in India, which views this move as a dangerous precedent in an already volatile relationship. India has expressed grave concerns over the safety of its diplomats in Canada, alleging that the Trudeau government has allowed a climate of extremism and violence to flourish. According to the MEA, the actions of the Canadian government have endangered Indian diplomats, and India has lost faith in Ottawa’s ability or willingness to ensure their security. In light of this, India has chosen to recall its diplomats, a dramatic move highlighting the severity of the diplomatic breakdown.
The rift between the two nations is not simply a product of recent events but has been exacerbated by longstanding tensions, particularly surrounding Canada’s handling of Sikh separatism. The Khalistan movement has long been a source of contention between India and Canada. India views the movement as a dangerous secessionist threat, while Canada has been criticised for allowing its soil to be used as a platform for anti-India activities. Trudeau’s government, in particular, has been accused by Indian officials of pandering to pro-Khalistan elements within Canada’s influential Sikh community for political gains, especially during the farmers’ protests in India in 2020.
Indian officials have repeatedly voiced their displeasure over Canada’s reluctance to act against individuals associated with the Khalistan movement, some of whom are reportedly linked to organised crime and terrorism. India’s frustration has been further fuelled by the Canadian government’s failure to extradite individuals wanted for crimes in India, a point emphasised by the MEA in its recent statements.
While Trudeau’s government insists that the allegations against Indian diplomats are based on credible evidence, India views this as an opportunistic move to deflect attention from domestic issues. The MEA’s statement that Trudeau’s actions serve a “separatist agenda” reflects India’s belief that the Canadian government’s handling of the Nijjar case is motivated more by political considerations than by a genuine concern for justice. With Trudeau facing criticism at home over foreign interference in Canadian politics, some in India see his actions as an attempt to shift the narrative and bolster his political standing.
What remains clear is that this diplomatic row threatens to have far-reaching consequences. Trade talks between the two nations have already stalled, and the future of bilateral cooperation on various fronts-from education to security-appears bleak. With India warning that it reserves the right to take further steps in response to Canada’s actions, the possibility of additional retaliatory measures cannot be ruled out. As two democracies, India and Canada should ideally work towards resolving their differences through dialogue and diplomacy. However, the current climate of distrust and recrimination makes such a resolution seem distant. The longer this standoff continues, the greater the risk of lasting damage to relations between these two nations.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
