Kashab Kumar
In the shadow of the Himalayas, a political earthquake is reshaping the landscape of Jammu and Kashmir, challenging centuries-old bonds and threatening to redraw the map of India’s northernmost region. The recent elections in Jammu have not only altered the political equation but have also brought to the forefront a paradox that strikes at the heart of Dogra identity and the shared history of Jammu and Kashmir. The Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) resounding victory marks a seismic shift in the region’s political landscape. Securing a majority of votes, the BJP has emerged as the dominant voice in Jammu, riding on a wave of regional aspirations and promises of development. This electoral triumph, however, carries with it the seeds of a controversy that threatens to unravel the very fabric of Jammu and Kashmir’s unified history. At the core of the BJP’s campaign was a tacit, and at times explicit, support for the idea of a separate Jammu state.
This stance, while resonating with a significant portion of Jammu’s electorate, stands in stark contrast to the party’s inability to make similar inroads in the Kashmir Valley. The BJP’s failure to crack what many term the “fortress of Kashmir” has seemingly intensified its focus on Jammu, fueling aspirations for statehood as a consolation prize. The party’s strategy appears to be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it has successfully mobilised a large section of Jammu’s population by tapping into feelings of neglect and aspirations for greater autonomy. On the other, it risks deepening the divide between Jammu and Kashmir, potentially undermining decades of efforts to foster unity and shared identity in the region. The current political climate in Jammu presents a striking paradox that cuts to the heart of the region’s inclusive heritage. On one side, we see Dogra people celebrating the legacy of the Maharajas of Jammu and Kashmir, taking pride in a history that saw the integration of diverse regions under a single rule. This celebration is not merely about political unification but a recognition of the rich tapestry of cultures, religions, and traditions that the Dogra rulers brought together.
The Dogra state, founded by Maharaja Gulab Singh in 1846, was more than a political entity; it was a grand experiment in multicultural coexistence that shaped the very essence of Jammu and Kashmir’s identity. For over a century, the Dogra rulers worked tirelessly to maintain and strengthen this unity, fostering cultural exchanges and economic ties between the regions. This period saw the emergence of a distinct Jammu and Kashmir identity that transcended regional and religious boundaries. The inclusive nature of this identity is evident in the region’s art, architecture, cuisine, and social practices. The famous Vaishno Devi temple in Jammu, for instance, has long been a pilgrimage site for devotees from Kashmir and beyond, fostering a sense of shared spiritual heritage. Similarly, the revered Sharada Peeth in Kashmir, now in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, was once a celebrated center of learning that attracted scholars from Jammu, Ladakh, and far beyond, symbolizing the intellectual cross-pollination that defined the region. The linguistic landscape of Jammu and Kashmir further illustrates this beautiful integration. Dogri, the predominant language of Jammu, shares many similarities with Kashmiri and has borrowed words from Persian and Arabic, languages that have significantly influenced Kashmiri. The Pahari dialects spoken in parts of both Jammu and Kashmir serve as a linguistic bridge, embodying the cultural continuity between the two regions. This linguistic intermingling is not just a matter of shared vocabulary but represents a deeper cultural symbiosis that has evolved over centuries, creating a unique communicative ecosystem that reflects the region’s diversity and unity. In stark contrast to this celebration of unity, the other side of the coin reveals a growing narrative supporting the idea of a separate Jammu state, a concept that stands at odds with the very legacy being celebrated. This dichotomy is particularly evident in public discourse and cultural events. Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in Dogra history, with grand celebrations marking the anniversaries of Dogra rulers and renewed efforts to preserve Dogra heritage sites. Ironically, these same celebrations often become platforms for voices advocating separation from Kashmir, a move that would effectively dismantle the unified state that the Dogra rulers worked so hard to create and maintain. The call for a separate Jammu state, while appealing to some, carries with it significant risks that threaten the inclusive culture that has long been the hallmark of Jammu and Kashmir. The region’s strength has always lied in its diversity – a tapestry of cultures, religions, and languages that have coexisted and enriched each other for centuries. This inclusivity is not just a matter of peaceful coexistence but of active cultural exchange and mutual influence. The creation of a separate Jammu state could lead to the erosion of this inclusive culture, fostering an environment where narrow regional identities trump the broader, more inclusive identity that has defined Jammu and Kashmir. The potential consequences of such a division are far-reaching. It risks marginalizing minority communities and disrupting the delicate balance of cultural exchange that has made the region unique. The famous Kashmiri handicrafts, for instance, have long found patronage and markets in Jammu, while Jammu’s agricultural produce has been vital for Kashmir’s economy. The traditional trade routes connecting Jammu to Kashmir and Ladakh have facilitated not just the exchange of goods but also ideas, art, and cultural practices. The famous Mughal Road, linking Jammu with Kashmir, stands as a historic symbol of this interconnectedness, its very existence a testament to the importance placed on maintaining links between these regions.
Moreover, the economic implications of such a division cannot be overlooked. Jammu and Kashmir have long shared a symbiotic economic relationship, with each region complementing the other in terms of resources, trade, and tourism. The world-famous Kashmir Valley’s horticultural produce has long found markets in Jammu, while Jammu’s agricultural output has been vital for Kashmir. A separation could disrupt these established economic patterns, potentially harming both regions in the long run. The tourism industry, a significant contributor to the region’s economy, thrives on the diverse offerings of Jammu’s pilgrimage sites, Kashmir’s scenic beauty, and Ladakh’s unique landscape and culture. Dividing the state could fragment this holistic tourist experience, impacting the livelihoods of countless individuals dependent on this sector. Perhaps the most concerning aspect of the push for a separate Jammu state is the potential domino effect it could trigger, particularly in regions like Rajouri, Poonch, and the broader Pir Panjal area. These areas, with their diverse ethnic and linguistic makeup, could see the emergence of their own separatist movements, further fragmenting an already complex region. The Pir Panjal region, home to a significant Gujjar and Bakerwal population, has its own distinct cultural identity. If Jammu were to separate, it’s not inconceivable that voices from Pir Panjal might also demand greater autonomy or even separate statehood. Such a scenario could open a Pandora’s box of competing claims and counter-claims, potentially destabilizing the entire region. The risk extends beyond just these areas. Other regions within Jammu, each with its unique cultural and ethnic makeup, might also be emboldened to demand greater autonomy or separation. This could lead to a balkanization of sorts, turning what was once a unified state into a patchwork of smaller, potentially less viable entities.
The inclusive fabric that has held these diverse communities together could be irreparably damaged, leading to increased social tensions and potentially even conflict. As Jammu stands at this critical juncture, the way forward requires careful consideration and inclusive dialogue. While the aspirations for greater autonomy and development in Jammu are legitimate, the solution may not lie in separation but in finding ways to address these concerns within the existing framework of unity. Several steps could be taken to address the underlying issues without resorting to division: implementing policies that ensure equitable development across all regions of Jammu and Kashmir, addressing the feeling of neglect that fuels separatist sentiments; strengthening efforts to preserve and promote the distinct cultural identities within Jammu and Kashmir, ensuring that diversity is seen as a strength rather than a source of division; exploring ways to ensure fair political representation for all regions within the existing structure, possibly through decentralization of power or the creation of regional councils; fostering greater economic ties between different regions, creating a stake for all communities in the unified development of Jammu and Kashmir; and promoting a nuanced understanding of the region’s shared history, emphasizing the legacy of unity and cultural synthesis that has defined Jammu and Kashmir for centuries. The path chosen will have profound implications not just for Jammu and Kashmir, but for India as a whole. It will test the nation’s commitment to unity in diversity and its ability to address regional aspirations without resorting to division. As the debate continues, it is crucial for all stakeholders – political leaders, civil society, and citizens alike – to engage in thoughtful dialogue, keeping in mind the rich tapestry of shared history and the potential consequences of division. The challenge lies in finding a way to honor Jammu’s aspirations while preserving the inclusive, diverse character that has long been the hallmark of this beautiful and complex region.
The true test for Jammu and Kashmir is not in how easily it can divide, but in how creatively it can stay united while addressing legitimate concerns. The shared history of the region demands nothing less than a solution that strengthens, rather than divides, the rich cultural and historical legacy of this land. The Dogra paradox, while challenging, also presents an opportunity – a chance to reimagine unity in a way that respects diversity, addresses grievances, and builds a future that honors the past while embracing the possibilities of tomorrow. In navigating these turbulent waters, the hope remains that wisdom will prevail, leading to solutions that reinforce the inclusive ethos that has been the bedrock of Jammu and Kashmir’s identity for centuries.
(The author is Assistant Professor Higher Education Department Jammu and Kashmir)
Follow our WhatsApp channel
