NEW DELHI, Aug 17: Former Jharkhand Chief Minister Madhu Koda today sought to drag former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as an accused in a coal scam case by telling a special court that the “ultimate final authority” cannot be allowed to go “scot-free” without facing trial.
He moved an application seeking to summon Singh as an accused along with Anand Swaroop, the then Secretary (Energy), and Jai Shankar Tiwari, the then Secretary(Mines and Geology), contending that CBI’s theory of conspiracy remains incomplete without the involvement of the then Prime Minister who was also holding the portfolio of Coal Minister.
Koda said Singh being the final authority to allocate coal blocks, cannot escape from the consequences of his decision.
The case pertains to alleged irregularities in allocation of Amarkonda Murgadangal coal block in Jharkhand to two Jindal group companies, Jindal Steel and Power Ltd (JSPL) and Gagan Sponge Iron Pvt Ltd (GSIPL). Koda, Jindal and 13 others were chargesheeted by the CBI in the case earlier.
In his plea, Koda said, “the materials placed by CBI shows that the said conspiracy, if any, cannot be complete without the involvement of the Coal Minister (Singh) who had the final say in the entire allotment.”
“The materials on record show that the Coal Minister was aware of the facts of the case and had taken the decision consciously with full application of mind to allot coal block to JSPL and GSIPL…Which according to the CBI is the result of conspiracy and is illegal. Hence, he (Singh) is also required to be summoned,” the plea filed before Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar said.
It further said that the court is required to consider that the case of all the other accused “stand on a better footing as compared to Dr Manmohan Singh” who has taken the ultimate and final decision to allot the coal block to JSPL and GSIPL.
The application said that during investigation, the chargesheet says that the allocation has been “made wrongly and not in public interest, (so) the ultimate final authority who made the allotment cannot be allowed to go scot-free without even facing the trial.”
Referring to the facts of the case and a Delhi High Court verdict, Koda said in his plea “it is clear that Dr Manmohan Singh as Coal Minister has allotted the coal block without public interest and there is sufficient evidence on record warranting this court to summon him for facing trial” if CBI’s contention was accepted that the allotment was illegal.
The plea further said, “It is not possible to obtain the final allotment in favour of M/s GSIPL against public interest without the involvement of the final allotting authority, namely the Coal Minister.”
It also said it would be “discriminatory and illegal” to charge one set of accused for having taken decision against public interest by recommending GSIPL’s name and, on the other hand, other set of officials, under whose signature the final allotment has taken place, are being allowed to go scot-free.
Koda further alleged that the “whole and sole responsibility” of coal block allocation rests with the Coal Minister as he was the final authority to take decision.
Regarding Swaroop and Tiwari, Koda said they were part of the three-member sub-group formed by Jharkhand Government to evaluate the pleas of firms and suggest suitable application for recommendation by the state.
He alleged that as per evidence placed on record by CBI, Swaroop and Tiwari had specifically recommended for withdrawal of recommendations made in favour of M/s Lanco Infratech and further recommended for enhancement of shares of M/s JSPL from 30 per cent to 70 per cent.
“It is therefore prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to summon Dr Manmohan Singh, the then Coal Minister /Prime Minister, Anand Swaroop, the then Secretary (Energy), and Jai Shankar Tiwari, the then Secretary(Mines and Geology), as accused persons for facing trial in the present case,” the plea said.
The copy of Koda’s application was supplied to CBI and the court asked the agency to file its reply.
The court also said it would hear arguments on Koda’s plea along with arguments on framing of charges in the case.
The court has fixed the matter for August 28 for scrutiny of documents supplied to the accused by CBI along with its charge sheet.
During the hearing, some of the accused including Congress leader and industrialist Naveen Jindal and Koda, told the court that scrutiny of documents supplied to them was complete.
Meanwhile, some of the accused moved pleas for supply of deficient copies after which the court asked the agency to provide these documents to the accused.
The court also said some documents, which were collected during the probe from accused and subsequently not relied upon by the agency, be returned to the accused.
Besides Jindal, Koda, former Minister of State for Coal Dasari Narayan Rao, ex-Coal Secretary H C Gupta and 11 others, including five firms, are accused in the case.
The other individual accused in the case are — Rajeev Jain, Director of Jindal Realty Pvt Ltd, Girish Kumar Suneja and Radha Krishna Saraf, Directors of GSIPL, Suresh Singhal, Director of New Delhi Exim Pvt Ltd, K Ramakrishna Prasad, Managing Director of Sowbhagya Media Ltd and chartered accountant Gyan Swaroop Garg.
Besides the ten accused, five firms — Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, Jindal Realty Pvt Ltd, Gagan Infraenergy Ltd (formerly known as GSIPL), Sowbhagya Media Ltd and New Delhi Exim Pvt Ltd — are also accused in the case.
While summoning them as accused, the court had said prima facie offences under section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) read with sections 409(criminal breach of trust by public servant), 420 (cheating) of IPC read with sections 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) (criminal misconduct by a public servant) of the Prevention of Corruption Act were made out against them. (PTI)
Follow our WhatsApp channel