Excelsior Correspondent
JAMMU, June 7: Division Bench of State High Court comprising Justice Tashi Rabstan and Justice Sanjay Gupta today modified the order of the writ court whereby selection/ appointment of 29 Assistant Engineers (Electricals) was stayed.
Against the order of the writ court two LPAs were filed and after hearing Senior Advocate KS Johal with Advocate Karan Singh Johal and Senior Advocate DC Raina with Advocate FA Natnoo for the appellants, DB modified the interim order passed by the writ court to the extent that appointment of last seven appointees/candidates selected under open merit category shall remain stayed. However, appointment of rest of the appointees/candidates shall remain subject to outcome of the writ petition.
All the appellants and private respondents are Engineering Graduates in the discipline of Electrical Engineering and Electronics and Communication Engineering. The Power Development Department (PDD) vide communication dated 09.07.2013 had referred 44 posts of Assistant Engineers (Electric) to the Public Service Commission, which vide Advertisement Notification No.15-PSC (DR-P) of 2013 dated 12.08.2013 notified the posts.
The appellants as well as writ petitioners-respondents responded against the notification. Against 44 posts, 2814 applications were received by the PSC and on the basis of a Computer Based Screening Test conducted on 30.11.2017, at two notified Centers viz. Jammu and Srinagar, 136 applicants- candidates were declared to have qualified in the ratio of 1:3 and were called for oral test/Interview.
Accordingly, 136 candidates appeared in the Screening Test. In terms of the order passed by court, one more candidate was allowed to participate in the selection process in addition to 136 candidates. On the basis of performance in the interview conducted as per the criteria fixed under Rule 51 of the J&K Public Service Commission (Business and Procedure) Rules, 1980 as amended from time to time and other related parameters, the select list was prepared and published vide Notification. No. 15-PSC (DR-S) of 2018 dated 03.04.2018. Subsequently appointment orders were issued in favour of the appellants.
The writ petitioners-respondents filed writ petition challenging the selection and appointment conducted by the Public Service Commission (PSC) inter alia on the ground that the candidates were selected on the basis of a non-uniform criteria, inasmuch as, various candidates were interviewed by different Selection Committees constituting of different expert members.
It was urged before the writ court that it was not possible for the different committees to adopt the same adjudging standards and to determine inter see merit amongst various candidates appearing before them and writ court, after analyzing the facts in depth stayed the selection and appointment of private respondents.
“Order passed by the Single Judge was an interim measure and selection and appointment of private respondents was stayed subject to objections and till next date of hearing only. Normally, the courts do not interfere in such matters where orders are passed subject to objections. However, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case that the appellants have already been appointed and writ petitioners-respondents are only seven in numbers, stalling whole selection process against the post of Assistant Engineer (Electrical) would not be appropriate at this stage”, DB observed.
“Thus, without entering into the merit of the case, we are inclined to modify the interim order passed by the writ court to the extent that appointment of last seven appointees/candidates selected under open merit category shall remain stayed. However, appointment of rest of the appointees/candidates shall remain subject to outcome of the writ petition”, the DB said and asked the writ court to take up the matter for final consideration at the earliest.
Trending Now
E-Paper
Follow our WhatsApp channel