A bitter lesson for Pak Army

B L Saraf
In   a  horrendous terror attack    on  humanity,   hundreds of  innocent school children  lost lives in the bloody alleys of APS Peshawar,  Pakistan. The carnage   shook   international   community  and   evoked   worldwide    condemnation. P M   Narendra  Modi and people of India  mourned the tragedy, no less.
In   ironical   sequence,     a number  of  scholarly and well researched books, on the    conduct   and modus  operandi   of Pakistan   elite and its Army,  hit the stands this year:   for a perceptible reader to conclude  what has happened  on  the black day  of   16th December,  2014  in Peshawar, was,  indeed, a                                                “tragedy  waiting  to  happen.”    Poisonous    snakes  reared in the backyard for the neighbours  have,   as     prophetically   noted   by    Hillary Clinton,  raised the hoods  and bitten the keeper,  in Peshawar.
T V Paul in his book  The Warrior State     says  that   Pakistan Army   and the elite  are obsessed with military balance with India, He writes   “The military elite has attempted  continuously to obtain security  by striving for strategic parity  with its larger neighbour   through arms  build up…….offering home base for transnational terrorist networks , engaging in terrorism on its own  and initiating wars and crisis to extract territorial concessions …………..”  p 12 .
Then,  he goes on to say    “The Pakistan elite has exhibited a tendency   to play   double  games  as way to extract  financial resources from its key allies, especially the United States. This is because of a conviction that if the security problem is fully solved   then the external ally will shun Pakistan .”p 21
Christine   Fair  in her book    Fighting To The End – Pakistan Army’s Way Of  War   has  raised certain questions, “Why does Pakistan Army continue to challenge the status -quo in Kashmir? Why does it support a fleet of  jihadi   groups despite the fact that some of these have turned against their patrons  ?  ….” P 2.
She has the   answer    ” .. …..  because  the Army’s concern and preoccupations are ideological  as much as military in scope , the Pak Army views its struggle with India in  existential terms. For  Pakistan’s men on horsebacks , not winning, not even repeatedly, is  not the same thing as losing .  But  simply  giving up and accepting status-quo and India’s supremacy is, by definition, defeat.   As a former chief of the staff explained to me in 2000,  Pakistan’s generals would always prefer to take calculated risks and be defeated than do nothing at  all. Pakistan’s Army would insist on action at almost on  any cost, even  that of presiding over a hollow state.  After  all, if the Pakistani state   are to make such concessions to India  it would  no longer  be  a state worth presiding over.  By seeing victory  as the ability to continue fighting Pakistani Army is able to seize victory even from the jaws of what other observers would deem defeat .”  p 7
In   a   vivid account of  what went wrong for US in Afghanistan,  Carlotta Gall   has,  in  her book. The Wrong  Enemy,   brought out the  duplicitious  role Pak Government and its  intelligence agencies  played  in  training and  protecting the  terrorists. What she has narrated   about Pakistan’s faith  in ‘Compartmentalization” of Taliban and other   terrorists as ‘good’ and  ‘ bad ‘ becomes  germane,  as  Nawaz Sharief  has  realised  the havoc this policy  has played with  Pakistan society.  She   gives  details of  a meeting of President Musharaf with the  political analysts, after 9/11.
Retired   Lieutenant general  Talat Massod  was one among the invites    who  told  the writer about the meeting , “Musharaf  asked them for advice on what the government should do. Massod  told the general  that he should cease the support for Taliban, and all  the militant groups, including the Pakistan ones who operated in Kashmir.”
Masood told the  author”  My  advice was that you should completely stop supporting the Taliban and the jihadi forces in Pakistan , in the sense that the government, the state, must follow the policy, completely stopping suppor.  Musharaf agreed that support to Taliban must end  but insisted that government would continue its support for the Pakistan groups  in Kashmir. The two could be ‘ Compartmentalized’, he said.  Massod,  says he warned  Musharaf  that, from experience, it could not be possible to close  one operation  down and not the other. Still Musharaff insisted  he could do it.”
The duplicity  in dealing with the  ‘ compartmentalized ‘  terrorists still persists, despite PM Sharief’s   ‘pious’ declarations to   discard the  theory and  treat all  terrorists,  equally, as enemies of the humanity.  Blood stains of the innocent children mowed down by the cowards are still visible and one  of  the master minds of  Mumbai 26 /11  carnage,  Zakiur  Rehman  Lakhvi,  gets  bailed out,  even when the lawyers in Lahore were on strike, mourning the death of  Peshawar children.
Sharief brothers  (Nawaz and Shabaz)  pay  court  to Haffiz  Saeed   and his co- harts  for   arranging  crowds   for their political  existence  and  ensuring  their physical safety. Imran  Khan, though,  did  condemn  the attack on Peshawar school but refused to name  the culprits.  Just  to look politically correct, for a moment, he did   share   dais   with the PM  Nawaz shrief, to mourn the death of the children . But  his  discomfiture was palpable: he   fumbled  for words.  He didn’t fumble on the weight of the tragedy but    to avoid naming the real culprits. Imran  Khan  has been an outright supporter of the Taliban and other terrorists.
He  can’t  afford to annoy them    because  his  political  existence   in   P K  province and elsewhere in Pakistan  is  dependent on  them.  So, denial   becomes  the rule for all the political forces in Pakistan
We can’t   expect   much     from  Pak establishment to  curtail militancy    in the region.
Soon they  will have to employ  their  ” assets ” who will be rendered jobless in Afghanistan after the withdrawal  of  NATO forces. What better way to employ them  than      sending   to Kashmir to  establish  ” Gods own country.”  Eradication   of  militancy is not one country’s  job in the region. Having seen what has been going on in their  ‘backyard ‘ it is imperative  on Pakistan  Army and the elite to cooperate, meaningfully, with all the countries in South East Asia   to see  total elimination of this scourge. Pak  Government must, in its own interest, realise the gravity of the situation and pay  heed   to the  warning  note sounded by    Dawn    editorial, in  aftermath of the  Peshawar tragedy , ” Denial  will  only lead to   worse  atrocities.”
(The author is Former Principal District & Sessions Judge )