CAT’s Stern Stance on Non-Compliance

The CAT Srinagar Bench has voiced strong disapproval of the laxity displayed by various Government departments in implementing its orders. This is part of a broader pattern where court orders are disregarded or delayed, forcing citizens to file contempt petitions to seek justice. In one such case, the CAT had passed a clear judgement nearly a year ago. Despite repeated extensions and opportunities for compliance, the judgement remains unimplemented. This led the Tribunal to order the personal appearance of the RTO Ladakh and the ARTO Leh. The seriousness of the Tribunal’s actions underlines the gravity of the situation-one that jeopardises the very foundation of judicial authority. It is not merely about the failure to implement a single order but about the broader implications of such negligence. Failure to comply with court orders erodes public trust in the legal system. The judiciary’s role as an impartial arbiter and enforcer of justice is undermined when its directives are treated with casual disregard. This lack of urgency signals a troubling disrespect for the rule of law, which can have far-reaching consequences for governance and public accountability.
The situation is further aggravated by the case involving Kiran Jyot Kour versus Dilbagh Singh, where a judgement for a compassionate appointment remains unexecuted even after 18 months. The delay in implementing such decisions affects the lives of ordinary citizens, often pushing them into prolonged legal battles that drain their resources and patience. What is particularly alarming is the apparent indifference displayed by the departments. The Deputy Advocate General’s inability to confirm whether the judgement has been challenged in a higher court exemplifies the lack of coordination and responsibility within the administrative machinery. The CAT’s decision to invoke the Contempt of Courts Act and potentially issue arrest warrants or attach properties of non-compliant officers underscores the seriousness of the issue. The principle of accountability must be upheld at all costs to maintain the integrity of the legal system and ensure that justice is not only done but seen to be done.