Dr. Hakim Singh
The Back-to-Village program was celebrated as a game changer in the post Article 370 era but it has been a failure even to resolve the basic issues in some places of Jammu and Kashmir.
In 2019, the Jammu and Kashmir Government initiated Back-to Village (B2V) program to enhance rural governance and services delivery process by dispatching senior officials on official tours of villages. The program was proposed to give voice to the villagers who could lodge their grievances and seek redressal at their doorsteps.
In essence, the B2V program was aimed to ease the sufferings and anxiety of the villagers. Soon, officials started visiting villages, staying there for at least two to three days to record the local problems. Visiting a Government office for local issues or services became a second option because the officials were now directed to provide resolution of problems at the villages only.
The villagers felt empowered, for their doorsteps were described as centres of services delivery. The welcome of visiting officials with local ‘band and baja’ followed by interactions filled the villagers with an atmosphere of hope and positivity. Thus, it was assumed that the issues of road connectivity, electricity, drinking water, internet facility and others will get resolved soon.
But the B2V program, which began in J&K in the post Article 370 era, has been a story of disappointment for Shirote village of Kishtwar district which has a population of about 1000 souls in approximately 200 households who continue to remain excluded from the ambit of development.
Basic civic amenities such as road, internet connectivity, health centre, bank, post office and others remain a distant dream. Like Panchayati raj institutions, the B2V programs sound like modern and people-centric initiatives on paper, but when it comes to the implementation part, they have been marred by allegations of corruption, inefficiency, unaccountability and lack of transparency.
Since 2019, the B2V program has completed five phases in the village. According to the stated aim of the program, Shirote should have reached a high stage of development. But surprisingly, the program has not even resolved one of the basic issues of road connectivity which was raised by the villagers over the last five years.
The lack of basic infrastructure in Shirote has not only kept the village backward and alienated but it has also set the Panchayat representatives in a freewheeling mode to work as per their vested interests.
The lack of road, communication or internet facility makes it hard for villagers to bring the functioning of Panchayat and District Administration under official scanner. Some of the local Panchayat members have never shown concern on the issue of road and communication as their absence provides a cover to their corrupt practices.
What I often observed about the B2V program is that the visiting officers and the Panchayat members colluded with each other for their own survival. In the process, both also empowered each other rather than the common people.
The program had drawn the attention of almost everyone in J&K. It may well influence the political discourse during the Panchayat polls with its claim of successfully resolving local issues in rural areas. But the promise to deliver the services at the doorstep or resolving the grievances on the spot has remained confined to papers only in case of Shirote.
A road doesn’t only ease routine life but it is linked to major socio-economic issues such as health and education. Amidst its physical cutoff, Sharoti faces a lot of problems. For five to six kilometres, there is no road or health facility while the working of the local panchayat has only spurred the political activities of the ruling party.
The villagers’ silence against this pathetic situation is not a sign of peace or acceptability but of ignorance and helplessness. Since the program started, no new development has occurred that could have eased the way of life in the village. The visit of officers has been managed by the Panchayat members. There has hardly been any interaction with women, tribals, poor or other stakeholders.
In the post-special status era, if the rule of law and governance was supposed to improve, why has the administration failed to bail out the beleaguered villagers of Shirote? When will the current administration end the crisis that the villagers confront even today, after the fifth phase of B2V?
The administration not only needs to analyse the idea but also the practical facets of the program. In John Rawls’s logic of fairness, a major learning is that none of the villages in ‘New India’ or ‘Viksit Bharat’ should feel excluded in the distribution of common amenities. Secondly, the implementation of his second ‘principle of difference’ should not also harm the last village. This is the only way forward to lift a village like Shirote from its backwardness.
(The author is a former Senior Research Fellow of Public Policy and Public Administration at the Central University of Jammu.)
Follow our WhatsApp channel
