J&K Vote 2014 —What it means?

B L Saraf
All over  bar celebrations   for    some and gloom for others,  2014  Election process to constitute   State Assembly is nearing its logical  end. By the time this piece appear in the print the process   would  be  complete.
Though a wily and brazen politician, seldom, leaves anything to guess, yet  gullible amongst are on the   guessing  game   as   to  who would embrace whom and who  will ditch whom- in  utter  somersault of their stated positions,  taken in run up to the elections.
To taste the fruit of power and pelf, new, opportunistically,  forged  alliances  will emerge  and the old  ‘political friendships’  will disappear, on the convoluted    principle of “To serve In the largest interests of the people.”
Let us   leave     the  ‘ honourable    elected  politicians’  to their tricks in the trade   and ourselves to ‘ not so bright fate at their hands’.
Election 2014  has  been fought   in interesting times and under    devastating circumstances.
It came at a time when BJP   is at the helm of affairs in Delhi, uninhibited by the coalition politics which,  in last two decades   plagued  and  incapacitated  previous Governments. Congress  party  has become almost extinct. These  election would be  known for : no holds barred electioneering by the PM Narendra Modi, campaigning in every nook and corner of the State in the extreme  weather  conditions;   absence of  flamboyant  Farooq Abdullah from the scene and, in contrast,          ‘omnipresence’ of   Mufti father – daughter duo; appearance  of  lotus buds  in the Valley in  Chilai Kalan;  and, lastly; the devastation created  by the unprecedented  floods.
High turnout in the  four  phases of ongoing Assembly elections  in Kashmir has different meaning for different people. (Fifth round is surely going to surpass the earlier turn outs). Each one concerned with the affairs of the state,  in general and of   Kashmir, in particular, reads them in his own  way.  For the most ,  it  marks celebration of democracy, and for some it is not the ‘substitute for right of self determination’.
The congenital, detractors of  India would interpret the Kashmir vote as an expression of people’s expectations    to have a local government  that brings in development and undertakes pro-people measures. To them, it has nothing  to do with the “final settlement of the issue” which , they say,  would continue to linger on. If  Kashmiris  have voted on such considerations – which they may have done –  then ,  a clear message  goes out    that they  abhor   attempts to destabilize  the  peaceful environment , so essential for growth,  development   and progress in their fortune. This could ,  well,    be   interpreted  as   a clear indication  of  Kashmtris  having rejected the   politics of  Hartaals  and shut downs , assiduously espoused by the separatists. Surely ,  no music to the ears of  Geelanis  and the  Mirwaizs .
Given the uncertain  political  environment, resting on fault lines,  there continue a number of determining  factors  in  the minds of  Kashmiris.  Some want ‘Aazadi’, few  seek merger  with Pakistan, quite a number of them would feel well off in the continuing    status-quo in the geopolitical  situation   and some may want to go  whole  hog    in the national fold.   Available indications show  that  urge to retain status-quo and promise of the development by the  new dispensation at  the Centre may have lured large number of the Kashmiris to the polling booths. So , issue seems to have been,  more or less,  settled for the continuation of the status – quo, albeit with  ushering in changes  necessary  for renewed   affirmation of faith in the democratic process  and  assured good governance.  Herein lies a huge test for the incoming Government.
It must govern  with;  utmost sensitivity, regard for human rights, concern for all, inspective of regional and ethnic consider rations ,  and  in a transparent  and  highly accountable manner.
We must recall that goodwill created by the Assembly elections of 1977, 1983, 2002 and 2008 was completely frittered away by the incumbents Governments   by   their      bad   governance. And in  this back ground if  the  people in the Valley   have come out  to express faith in the democratic process, despite heavy odds    and at great physical threat, tribute should be paid to their perseverance of the thought  and sense of forbearing. Their trust in the  democracy will  give birth to the new governance regime. Therefore, it is  incumbent upon all of us , particularly on those at the helm ,  not to forget lessons that got  thrown up as  a bloody aftermath–a consequences of bad  governance, post elections mentioned above. No need  to  repeat, we  are hardly out of the woods.
Still , many misguided young have guns in their  hands. Hurt feelings are yet to be   assuaged. It is our duty to consolidate the gains of huge voter turn out.
See the fallacy of  separatists   argument on the ongoing elections! Ali Shah Geelani  has congratulated people of Srinagar for heeding his call of poll boycott. According to him, the participation of people in these elections would have  meant  an endorsement of India’s cause in the state.
Geelani  needs to be told that his argument is turning on head and goes against the separatist  programme. Because , barring just a couple of constituencies in  Srinagar city- (where, too, voting percentage has gone up from what it was in 2008) – more  than  forty   out of the total 46 constituencies,  that have gone to the polls in the Valley , voter turnout  has been  well   over  60%., which could,  on the  Geelani    argument,  mean full endorsement of India in Kashmir  and dumping of the separatist ‘s  cause.
Separatists   may be feeling rejected and dejected. The incoming State Government and the Central Government will have to ensure that  they don’t get rejuvenated, by their actions or inactions.   Accordingly, a heavy duty is cast on both the governments.  Modi  Government could do well to  pay urgent attention to the  rehabilitation of the flood devastated populace of Srinagar city  and redeem his reputation   as a  builder.
As he should do so   in ameliorating  the  distress of POK   and  West Pakistan refugees  ,  and  of the Kashmir   migrants.  History    seems to have marked him for the job.
Let PM Narendra Modi discharge it in close cooperation with the local Government, of  whatever hue, and leave  an indelible print in the   state’s history.
(The author is Former   Principal  District  & Sessions Judge)