Dr Varinder Sharma
The proposed ropeway project between Tarakote Marg and Sanji Chhat along the Mata Vaishno Devi track has become a focal point of debate, dividing opinions among stakeholders in the region. Estimated to cost ?250 crore, the initiative aims to enhance the pilgrimage experience by offering a modern transportation option. However, it has sparked significant resistance from local shopkeepers, pony owners, palanquin operators, and labourers, who fear that it threatens their livelihoods. The protests, which escalated into clashes with law enforcement, underscore the complexity of balancing development with traditional practices and community needs.
Proponents of the ropeway project emphasise its potential to transform the pilgrimage experience. One of the primary benefits is enhanced accessibility. The 12-13 kilometre trek to the revered shrine is physically demanding and time-consuming, often deterring elderly and differently-abled devotees. By significantly reducing travel time, the ropeway would allow more pilgrims to complete their journey comfortably and efficiently. Safety is another crucial factor. The current trek is not without risks, including landslides, exhaustion, and overcrowding during peak seasons. The ropeway promises a secure and reliable mode of transportation, mitigating these challenges while providing peace of mind to pilgrims and their families.
Additionally, the ropeway could boost tourism in Jammu and Kashmir. By modernising the infrastructure, it could attract more visitors to the region, contributing to the local economy. Increased footfall at the shrine might indirectly benefit businesses in related sectors, such as hospitality, food services, and retail. The eco-friendly nature of the ropeway is another significant advantage. By reducing reliance on ponies and palanquins, it could also address long-standing hygiene issues along the track caused by animal waste.
While the benefits of the ropeway are compelling, the concerns raised by local stakeholders cannot be ignored. The most pressing issue is the displacement of livelihoods. Shopkeepers, pony owners, and labourers depend on the existing trek for their income, with many families relying on these jobs for generations. They fear that the ropeway will drastically reduce foot traffic along the traditional route, leaving them without viable alternatives. The protests that erupted recently reflect deep-seated anxiety over economic security, as these communities have limited resources to adapt to such a transformative change.
The trek’s cultural and spiritual significance adds another layer of complexity. For many devotees, the journey to Mata Vaishno Devi is not merely a physical endeavour but a form of penance. Walking the entire route is considered an integral part of the pilgrimage, enhancing its sanctity and personal meaning. Critics of the ropeway argue that it might dilute this traditional experience, turning a sacred journey into a routine commute.
Environmental concerns also loom large over the project. While the ropeway itself is environmentally friendly, its construction could cause significant disruption. Deforestation, excavation, and habitat loss are likely during the building phase, potentially harming the region’s biodiversity. The short-term environmental costs must be weighed against the long-term benefits, with stringent safeguards in place to minimise damage. Over-commercialisation is another risk. Excessive commercialisation might overshadow the spiritual and cultural aspects of the shrine, diminishing its unique appeal.
Social unrest and resistance from local communities present further challenges. The recent protests, which escalated into clashes between demonstrators and police, highlight the potential for prolonged tensions if stakeholders’ concerns are not addressed. Such incidents could tarnish the region’s image, deterring pilgrims and tourists alike. The situation underscores the importance of engaging with local communities to build consensus and ensure that the project benefits all parties involved. Progress, while indispensable, must not come at the expense of alienating local communities or undermining the spiritual and ecological sanctity of the region.
However, history has shown that resistance to change in Katra is not unprecedented. Similar opposition emerged during the formation of the Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board, which took over shrine management. Despite initial scepticism, these changes catalysed remarkable progress, transforming Katra and the entire pilgrimage route. The number of pilgrims has nearly doubled since then, necessitating alternative cave entries and an additional route. Comparable resistance was observed when battery-operated vehicles were introduced, only for these fears to be proven baseless over time. Both locals and pilgrims reaped the benefits of these reforms. The Bhairon Ghati ropeway serves as a precedent, operating successfully with negligible impact on stakeholders’ businesses. Similarly, the proposed ropeway would function as a premium alternative, accessible primarily to those who can afford it. Examples like the Gulmarg Gondola illustrate how capacity constraints inherently limit the extent of its impact; even if desired, the administration cannot accommodate the over one crore annual pilgrims on the ropeway. Only a fraction will likely avail themselves of this service.
Nevertheless, several considerations warrant close scrutiny before advancing with the project. One critical factor is the weather, particularly during summers, when ropeway travel could become unviable due to scorching temperatures unless trolleys are air-conditioned. The ecological impact is another pressing concern, as excessive construction inevitably harms the environment. Additionally, the carrying capacity of pilgrimage spaces, such as Bhavan, must be rigorously respected. Overcrowding has already led to stampedes during peak seasons, and risking pilgrims’ lives for the sake of tourism under the guise of modernisation is indefensible.
The apprehensions voiced by the local population merit careful and empathetic consideration. A shorter pilgrimage duration could lead to significant revenue losses, as pilgrims may opt for a same-day visit, bypassing overnight stays at Bhavan or Katra. This shift directly threatens hoteliers, shopkeepers, and local transport providers. To counterbalance this impact, the Government must explore the development of supplementary mega-tourism projects in Katra or its vicinity. Initiatives such as amusement parks, water parks, or a world-class museum could incentivise pilgrims to extend their stay, fostering an alternative tourism experience while bolstering the local economy.
To move forward, it is essential to strike a balance between development and tradition. One way to achieve this is through a comprehensive compensation plan for those affected by the ropeway. Financial aid, retraining programs, and alternative employment opportunities should be offered to shopkeepers, pony owners, and labourers. For instance, locals could be employed in the construction, maintenance, and operation of the ropeway, ensuring that they share in its economic benefits. Preserving the traditional trekking route with additional facilities is another important consideration. While the ropeway offers convenience, the existing path should be made more comfortable to make it an equally enjoyable pilgrim experience. This dual approach would respect cultural and spiritual sentiments while providing an alternative for those who prefer modern amenities. Environmental safeguards must also be prioritised during construction. Measures such as afforestation, habitat restoration, and sustainable waste management should be integral to the project plan. The Government must collaborate with environmental experts to minimise ecological disruption and ensure long-term sustainability.
The proposed ropeway project along the Mata Vaishno Devi track is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it promises to modernise the pilgrimage experience, enhance safety, and boost tourism. On the other hand, it raises significant concerns about livelihood displacement, cultural traditions, and environmental impact. The recent protests underscore the complexity of balancing progress with community welfare, highlighting the need for a thoughtful and inclusive approach.
The administration must address these concerns with a balanced and pragmatic approach. The anxieties of local stakeholders are not unfounded, and dismissing them risks deepening mistrust. Stakeholder engagement must be prioritised to craft a solution that accommodates all interests while safeguarding the environment and the community. Investing 250 crore without adequately mitigating the repercussions on thousands of livelihoods or the natural ecosystem would be counterproductive. The Government must take a comprehensive view of the situation, devising strategies that harmonise progress with preservation and inclusivity. Ultimately, the success of the ropeway project depends on the Government’s ability to address stakeholders’ concerns while staying true to the region’s cultural and spiritual heritage. With careful planning, transparent communication, and a commitment to sustainability, the project could serve as a model for development that benefits all parties involved. By respecting the voices of local communities and ensuring that no one is left behind, the Government can transform this ambitious initiative into a milestone for inclusive growth and harmony.
(The writer is Co-convenor Professional Cell J&K BJP)
Follow our WhatsApp channel
