Satish Manhas
The recent unrest in the Pakistan-Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK) region has once again brought to the forefront questions about its future and the role of India in the ongoing political dynamics. The decades-old conflict in the region has seen periods of heightened tensions and sporadic violence, often intertwined with political, historical, and territorial complexities. In the light of these developments, there have been discussions and debates over TV, social media although unofficial regarding the readiness of POJK to merge with India and the potential need for Indian military intervention to address the escalating situation.
To understand the current situation in POJK, it’s crucial to delve into the historical background of the region. The dispute over Kashmir dates back to the partition of British India in 1947 followed by an attack on Jammu and Kashmir by Pakistan army regulars and kabilis leading to the Indo-Pakistan wars and ongoing territorial disputes. POJK refers to the portion of Jammu and Kashmir under illegal Pakistani control, which India legitmately claims as part of its territory. The region has been a focal point of contention between India and Pakistan, with both countries asserting their sovereignty over it. But now the recent unrest in POJK because of sky rocketing prices, atrocities of Pakistani army and crackdown on the genuine political voices has taken the freedom movement in POJK to a new high. The recent unrest in POJK has been characterized by protests, political instability, and clashes between POJK freedom fighter groups and Pakistani security forces which has led to killing of Pakistani rangers and injuries to dozens of POJK freedom fighters. Factors contributing to this unrest include grievances among the local population, allegations of human rights abuses, and the influence of external actors fuelling freedom movements. The situation has raised concerns in India at all levels and many top political leaders including the Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, Home Minister Amit Shah, EAM S Jaishanker made political statements regarding the merger of POJK with India. This time the protesters in POJK have openly batted for its merger with India. Many social and political organizations in India are also expressing their serious concerns with regard to the high handedness and atrocities of Pakistani army on citizens in POJK. This tension in the region also saw India and Pakistan, with rhetoric and accusations exchanged at international forums as well. For the first time since this area went into the illegal occupation of Pakistan it’s readiness to merge with India is being discussed at all local, national and even international levels although it seems complex and multifaceted. On one hand, there are voices within the region advocating for closer ties with India, citing cultural, historical, and economic affinities. Proponents of integration argue that aligning with India would provide greater opportunities for development, stability, and democratic governance. However, challenges such as differing political aspirations, concerns about autonomy, and the legacy of conflict pose significant hurdles to any immediate merger. Although, the prospect of Indian military intervention in POJK is a sensitive and contentious issue and it’s not being batted openly by any quarter considering security and strategic aspects but time seems ripe and Pakistani army from the area now need to be wiped out. While some argue that decisive action is necessary to address security threats and restore order, others caution against escalation and emphasize the importance of diplomatic solutions. Military intervention carries significant risks, including the potential for further violence, international backlash, and complicating existing peace processes. So, amidst these challenges, diplomatic efforts and multilateral engagement play a crucial role in addressing the unrest in POJK. International forums, such as the United Nations, provide platforms for dialogue and conflict resolution, although practically defunct and irrelevant in case of POJK. Regional cooperation initiatives aimed at fostering peace, development, and cross-border exchanges can contribute to easing tensions and building trust among stakeholders (POJK’iens) and its final merger with India. The international community’s role in the POJK conflict also needs to be contained and only Pakistani army atrocities must be the debate if any. Diplomatic pressure on Pakistan, mediation efforts involving POJK leadership, and pressure for peaceful dialogue between Pakistani army and the protesters are essential in de-escalating tensions and promoting a conducive environment for resolving the dispute and turning tables in Indias favor. Regional stakeholders, including neighboring countries and global powers, can also leverage their influence to encourage constructive engagement and prevent further destabilization by allowing POJK people to merge with India as per their wish and will.
In conclusion, the recent unrest in POJK underscores the complexities and challenges inherent in the region’s dynamics. While discussions about merging with India and potential military intervention are part of the discourse, a nuanced approach that prioritizes diplomacy, dialogue, and inclusive engagement is essential. Sustainable solutions to the POJK conflict require addressing root causes, respecting the aspirations of the local population, and fostering a conducive environment for peace and stability. As the situation continues to evolve, constructive engagement and multilateral cooperation remain indispensable in charting a path towards lasting peace and prosperity in the region. Lastly the statements from Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, Home Minister Amit Shah etc and the simultaneous merge sentiment expressions from thousands and thousands of protesters from POJK only require the formal fulfillment of Indian Parliament resolution of 1992 to make Jammu and Kashmir once again a complete Jammu and Kashmir and restore its pristine glory.
Let’s all hope it’s done like the abrogation of Article 370 without a single shot fired. However, the situation in the region is indeed complex and delicate, with tensions often running high. Moreover discussing military intervention or merging territories requires careful consideration of political, social, and international factors. It’s essential to prioritize peaceful dialogue, diplomatic efforts, and regional cooperation to address issues and maintain stability. But, finally for India! They are our brothers and sisters. They are part and parcel of our geography, our inheritance, our history. They are part of our political system. They have been caged, barricaded illegally. They have every right for a respectful freedom and India and Indians are duty bound to help them fulfill their more than 75 years old aspirations.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
